Saturday, March 6, 2010

A Tribute to My Favorite Album of the Decade


Blackwater Park
Opeth (2001)

*****

*****

Looking at some lists of the "best music albums of the decade," I noticed some consensus top choices ("Kid A" and "Yankee Hotel Foxtrot" to name a few). I won't deny that these albums are musically innovative, but honestly the only "top album" that really grabs me is Arcade Fire's "Funeral." In choosing my top album of the decade, I will break from the mold a bit and choose an album from an oft-neglected genre - heavy metal.

Opeth is typically classified as "progressive death metal," a term which already looks like a handful but doesn't even begin to describe the type of music that they make. Mikael Akerfeldt's songwriting transcends all of the guidelines and stereotypes of metal, and can be enjoyed by both heavy metal fans, who will see the music as novel, and non-metal fans, who will find the music surprisingly accessible.

The defining characteristic of the band's music is the ability to weave together all different types of expressions and styles so seamlessly. One moment, you may be hearing raging screams over percussive distortion guitar riffs. Then comes a solemn piece on the piano or acoustic guitar, and then a jazzy segment with clean vocals. Yet as eclectic as each piece of Opeth's music is, all of it feels so natural and makes so much sense, and this is what sets Blackwater Park apart from the decade's other musical innovations.

Blackwater Park, for Opeth, is a starting point for what would eventually be a decade of consistently great music characterized by their trademark sound and songwriting style, and perhaps more importantly, production of the highest quality. However, in my opinion Blackwater Park is still their magnum opus - as an album it is the most cohesive of all their works, and its influence on their music and on many other bands is undeniable.

As is the case with all of Opeth's albums, Blackwater Park is meant to be listened to all the way through as one "song." Accordingly, the album is not really divided into "songs" as much as "movements," in the style of long-form classical music. With an average track length of about 8 1/2 minutes, each song contains musical themes that carefully develop and evolve into or are shoved aside by new ones - though once in a while you may hear a brief reprise and think, "whoa, we heard this 7 minutes ago... how did we get all the way back here?!" with an expression of amazed surprise.

But the musical complexity of the album isn't the only thing that makes it so great. Over the course of 67 minutes, the band creates an immersive musical atmosphere that approaches the greatness of my all-time favorite album, Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon. There is not a single bad moment to be found in either work, and each one brings a new experience upon every re-listen.

Typically, I listen to music (a wide variety of genres, might I add) while doing something else, like using my computer, studying, or walking somewhere. But there are some albums that I find worthwhile to just sit down, relax, close my eyes, and absorb - and Blackwater Park is one of a select few.

At this point, I encourage you to do exactly this: pop in the album, get rid of distractions, and absorb and appreciate this masterpiece. (Well, at the very least pop in the album...) Below is an extremely detailed listening guide for the album, which may be useful to skim if you're deciding whether or not to invest your next hour listening to some Opeth, but is intended more as a supplementary read while or after listening to the album, to deepen your appreciation. Yes, the guide is incredibly lengthy, but it just only scratches the surface of all the substance in this masterpiece.

*****

Opeth's Blackwater Park
Jason's extremely detailed listening guide

Blackwater Park opens with the fading in of a barely audible, eerie and dissonant noise, before coming in with a bang (0:28). The beginning of "The Leper Affinity" contains the hardest, loudest, and fastest music of the entire album. The opening riffs are sure to please any metal fan, and for those not used to this type of music, rest assured that these brutal opening passages are actually leading to something beautiful. By the end of the album, you will not even notice how "metal" much of the album really is! Already the music is getting pretty technical. Did you notice the triplet-duplet polyrhythms between the guitars and vocals in the first riff (0:43) and the fact that the music changes from 3/4 to 6/8 meter at (0:56)? Hopefully you didn't before I pointed it out, because the subtlety that Opeth is able to incorporate into their musical complexity is impressive. The transition at (2:12) is great. From a melodic death metal tone that sets the tone of the track, we go into a segment with a more thrash-influenced style (think Metallica) that is perfect for headbanging. After some development, we get a recapitulation of the same riff at (3:14) with a more slurred articulation (again a subtle detail), which is the perfect setup for the slow, melodic segment at (4:05). The solo guitars here sound like they're really singing - crying even. (4:46) is the first part of the album that would make someone familiar with Opeth but not with the album go, "oh hey, this is an Opeth album." Acoustic guitars, clean singing - the balance and contrast this has with the heavier portions of the album is what makes the album shine. And here, the high production quality of the album, which is marked by an uncharacteristic amount of clarity for a metal album, is at its most obvious. The way that this somewhat jazzy/funky portion gradually builds back up to the original theme from (5:38) to (6:53) is masterful and has some great rhythms. The music eventually calms down into a pretty piano segment (8:52) that is just filled with longing. Thinking about this track as a whole, it follows a classical sonata form (A-B-A-coda), which is interesting in that A) it doesn't follow the verse-refrain format that is too popular in music today, and B) it develops a "B" section (the slow part) that is so different from the "A" section, yet each transition flows so naturally. This track alone is already a masterpiece, but we're only getting started, because the piano solo segues right into the second track.

"Bleak" is a beautiful track that stands out in an already great album, and its greatness need not be explained, though I will proceed anyway to note some details. The themes in the first three minutes of the song are based on the exotic-sounding Arabic and Hungarian scales, and right away the great consonance between the acoustic and electric guitars is amazing and is a testament to the album's production quality. The expressive quality of the growling vocals always intrigues me - it is completely devoid of the anger that runs rampant in death metal vocals, and Mikael Akerfeldt does an excellent job conveying the emotions found in the lyrics. The cadence at (2:39) is awesome - even though it's on an acoustic guitar, it's possible the most jarring moment in the album so far. At (3:08) is a super-technical lick that leads to the second main chunk of the song, which has an incredibly catchy clean vocal part. This is sung over a guitar riff whose notes could easily be the instrumental for a hard rock song, but here is played and produced with such a legato quality that for a rhythm guitar part, it is incredibly lyrical. The passages at (4:26) to (5:59) are pretty straight up - the bass part in particular is quite cool. For some reason Eric Clapton comes to mind. The band makes a smart decision at (5:16) to hold the pause for longer than a full four counts. We expect them to come back in, but they trick us and don't come in until a beat or two later. At (6:00) begins the development of a great multilayered atmosphere, though it is still easy for a listener to follow. Then, of course, at (7:21) comes back that cool part again from a while ago - though for some reason I feel like it has a more powerful quality to it this time around, especially once the vocals transition back into death metal growling. As the track is wrapping up, the drum part goes into double at (8:43), which is pretty sweet, before the track ends with what sounds kind of like an electric guitar dying.

"Harvest" is some nice easy listening after two long, complex tracks. It is done the entire way through with soft, clean vocals over an acoustic guitar backing. The two vocal parts sound pretty much perfect together, whether they are singing in octaves, in harmony, or in unison. Interestingly, the drummer sounds like he's using brushes here, which brings a nice contrast to the harder drumming found previously. Obviously it's a huge deviation from heavy metal standards. The music seems pretty straight up this time, but the key signatures are going all over the place! The song opens in E minor before going into C minor for the first main vocal part ("Stay with me awhile") and then into A minor for the next ("Into the orchard") before standing on B minor ("Wilted scenes for us"). The chord progressions don't really make any sense to me, but Opeth makes it work. At (3:13) is... wait for it... another key change! This time into D minor. The guitar solo here isn't too melodic, but is very emotional. Not much else to say... just relax and enjoy this one.

After a track that is simpler and closer to a regular song, we dive right back into all-out Opeth mode with "The Drapery Falls", whose opening lead guitar riff reminds me a little of King Crimson's epic track "In the Court of the Crimson King." The bass part under this riff is excellent too - it dances around the fretboard with a little bit of a groove to it and while the fits with the music around it, it also has a personality of its own. This intro is one of those moments where you can really "lose yourself to the music" as Eminem would put it, and it leads perfectly to the next section that starts at (1:46). This passage is noticeably bare compared to the musical multilayering of much of the album and is reminiscent of the "B" section of "The Leper Affinity," especially in the vocal effects and absence of a drum part. After some crazy acoustic guitar chords, in comes the drums and some passionate singing at (2:47). The first time around, this phrase dies back down into bareness, but the second time it segues into a long crescendo, eventually leading to an intense passage with the first death metal vocals (5:06) that we've heard in over ten minutes. This is some great songwriting here! If the album had a "plot curve," this could be the peak right here. At (5:35), the band puts aside melody and just grinds out some huge power chords, leading to an insane dissonant vamp at (5:50) in 5/16 time that after a while transcends even trying to make sense but somehow leads flawlessly right into the next section at (6:09). The rhythm becomes a little more clear now - it's 5/8 (or 10/16), with the beats grouped 3-3-2-2 (like the Mission Impossible theme), and a couple of measures of different lengths tossed in every now and then. Finally we go back to a straight 6/8 at (6:49), which is what we've been accustomed to for much of the album. Still, the intensity is not at all waning. The riff here is vamped for a while, but at (7:19) it goes into double time, but with the beats grouped 3-3-2-2-2 instead of a straight up 3-3-3-3 or 2-2-2-2-2-2. For some reason, this reminds me a little bit of Green Day. The big shocker comes at (7:47) when all of the instruments suddenly drop out. But don't let this brief acoustic guitar / vocal duet fool you, because it alternates rapidly with some really heavy stuff, complete with double bass drum pedaling action. Eventually, the original theme of the track makes its reprise at (8:41), which by now should be no surprise, as the band has largely been following an A-B-A sonata form for most of the tracks. As the double bass drum beats become more prominent, the music fades into nothingness, which is the ideal ending considering the track to follow.

"Dirge for November" is probably the track in the album that focuses most on using music to create a pure mood rather than a mood concealed within a melody. Unlike the other tracks, you can't really sing along to the tunes in this track, and if you tried to, you're missing the point. The beginning of the track is very obviously bare, and the tempo is very rubato, which is an art that is largely disappearing and often misinterpreted when actually performed. The suspension and resolution at (0:08) and the dissonance at (0:18) are simply astounding. This passage can be thought of as a kind of introduction to the rest of the track, starting at (0:45), which is more cohesive. The name of the game from this point on is "4," because that seems to be the number of times each riff is repeated. But it's clear here that Opeth is aiming for a slow, deliberate development of the mood - a constantly shifting atmosphere would be disorienting. The beginning of the instrumental passage is the closest we really come to a melody, and features the electric guitar playing with such a muted sound that it almost resembles the sound of a nylon-strung classical guitar. At (1:43) is the sudden entrance of the distorted guitars, which play a variation of the previous riff. By the time the vocals reenter at (3:27), the themes have become almost hypnotic. This trance-like death metal is sustained until (5:45), when the music dies down to a clean guitar riff that is not at all melodic but contains some beautiful chords and sweeping arpeggios. Out of all the great tracks on the album, this might be the least "memorable" for its lack of melody - but that doesn't diminish the track's greatness. Just kick back and absorb the music, the mood, the ambience.

After the fading out of the guitar in "Dirge for November" comes the fading in of a ominous repeated, dissonant, broken chord on the acoustic guitar in "The Funeral Portrait", which is followed by a thrashy section at (0:30) which makes you remember that, yes, this is an album that you can rock out to when the time is right. Not much commentary is needed here - most of the track is straight up and easy to enjoy. The short interlude at (3:53) seems to be kind of jazz fusion influenced, with the acoustic guitar and drums having a little back-and-forth conversation. The track then gradually becomes more atmospheric and less rhythmic, starting with (4:07), which still has hints of thrash with the tight rhythms on the bass drum, and eventually leading to (4:28), which has a foggy feel despite the near blues-iness of the guitar solo and the jazzy drum beats at (4:43). And of course, what long Opeth track would be complete without a recapitulation of the first theme (5:28)? The coda section starting at (6:33) is really interesting because its chord progressions seem to be heavily influenced by classical music theory. This is especially evident in the iv-iib-V7 chord progression at (6:37), which is hardly ever used in music nowadays. At (6:48)... three-part vocal harmony mixed in with counterpoint... Bach would be proud! The change into double time at (7:16) should by now not come as a surprise. We get a little bit of double lead guitar action as the track fades out to...

"Patterns in the Ivy", which at a mere 1:52 in duration is clearly meant as an interlude between two beastly tracks. Just relax and enjoy the beautiful contemporary harmonies of this acoustic guitar / piano duet.

Finally we arrive at the big ending - the title track of the album, "Blackwater Park", which might be the least technically complex track in the album - centering almost entirely on the D Hungarian scale - but it is still pure awesome. It starts with a march-like feel that at times (1:25 in particular) reminds me of the opening riffs of Metallica's classic "For Whom the Bell Tolls". The opening sections are definitely influenced by 80's and 90's metal (Pantera comes into mind), and even though a true metalhead will never get sick of the key of E, Opeth switches things up here by going into drop D tuning, which I tend to associate with lots of oomph and slower, steady beats. When the heavy guitars suddenly drop out in (2:41), we're left with a beautiful clean guitar riff that will be vamped over and over again while various other parts interact with it - very much in the progressive rock style - like the electric guitar part at (3:44) that has a vocal quality to it (though the vamped riff is replaced briefly by an acoustic guitar at this point). This is the last track of the album, and you can probably guess that this serene section is preparation for an epic ending. Indeed, the music fades back in at (5:10) and is even heavier than it was at the beginning of the track. The use of the kill switch at (6:37) and at various points later adds some rhythmic flavor and gives Opeth even more bonus points. The riff at (8:07) is a reprise of the clean guitar riff vamped in the previous section, and obviously has a completely different feel this time, played in octaves on a distorted guitar - so grand, orgasmic even. Once again, the riff is vamped, but this time there is more development going on, with the rhythms going into double time at (8:51). The passage starting at (9:14) marks a kind of final climax of the album before the brief, disorienting "pause" at (9:37) and denouement at (9:48). As the track and album wind down, layers of sustained electric guitar notes pile on top of each other starting at (10:56), much like the end of "Master of Puppets", until (11:19). Here you may be expecting the album to end with a grandiose, shredding away of the strings, which is understandable because a lot of bands like to rock out like this before they end their show. It will probably be surprising, then, to hear the album end with a single, staccato, power chord, followed by the gradual fading out of an acoustic guitar over the course of a minute. And so we are reminded of the famous ending lines of T.S. Eliot's "The Hollow Men" - "This is the way the world ends / This is the way the world ends / This is the way the world ends / Not with a bang but a whimper."

*****

For the lyrics to Blackwater Park, click here.

Monday, February 8, 2010

20 of the Best Films of the Decade

So I originally wanted to do a Top 10 list for movies of this decade, but that became way too difficult. So was ranking the movies in any way, so here's just a list (in chronological order of initial release) of 20 movies from 2000-2009 that are outstanding in one way or another and definitely worth watching - especially for anyone who wants to get into movies without jumping into the deep end (i.e. the ocean of great, old movies).

For another perspective on some of the best films of the decade, check out Jabe's blog entry, which is definitely written much more eloquently than what is to follow.

*****

Dancer in the Dark dir. Lars von Trier (2000)

Featuring two quirky personas in director Lars von Trier and lead actress Björk, this one-of-a-kind musical combines the best qualities of both to make one of the most memorable films of the decade. Dancer in the Dark combines the emotional pain of von Trier's earlier Breaking the Waves and the alternative filming style of all of his works with Björk's mysterious aura and unique musical style. That's right, the songs are done in the trippy, electronic musical style of Björk.

Memento dir. Christopher Nolan (2000)

Here we have one of the most interesting storytelling devices to ever hit a screen, and the substance behind it doesn't disappoint. Anti-hero Leonard Shelby has a condition in which he cannot form new memories, and so he finds himself caught in the middle of a situation - which is really only a situation because of his condition. The story is told in reverse order, yet in a not confusing manner, so that we can see an already intense plot unfold to us in the form of a mystery.

Amélie dir. Jean-Pierre Jeunet (2001)

The quintessential feel-good movie of the decade. Nitpickers can say all they want about the film, but the truth is that what it intends to do, Amélie does perfectly. Filmed with the quirky writing and rich cinematography that has become a signature of Jean-Pierre Jeunet, and filled with some charming acting - in particular by Audrey Tautou, who plays the title role - Amélie is a great watch with a significant other or just anytime you need a smile.

Moulin Rouge! dir. Baz Luhrmann (2001)

The final installment of Baz Luhrmann's "Red Curtain Trilogy," Moulin Rouge! has Luhrmann written all over it and is tons of fun. As dictated by the Red Curtain principles, the film alienates the audience so much that you're always aware that you're watching a movie. This slight uncomfortableness combines with things we've seen from Luhrmann before: vibrant cinematic touches (Romeo + Juliet) and a quirky writing style (his radio hit "Everybody's Free (To Wear Sunscreen)," combining plot elements of three famous operas with some great arrangements of pop music hits.

Mulholland Drive dir. David Lynch (2001)

David Lynch's Mulholland Drive is a thriller made in the most unconventional of ways and is probably Lynch's most accessible film, though that certainly isn't saying much. If you think Lost is cryptic - well, this movie makes the TV series seem as clear as crystal. For some reason, though, it keeps you engaged in the convoluted, dreamlike "plot." Trying to make sense of it is not only optional, but also discouraged. Still, it has been the subject of extensive study by Lynch fanatics. Only David Lynch can make a movie this twisted that is so great that people actually have the patience to want to unlock its mysteries.

Monster's Ball dir. Mark Forster (2001)

Monster's Ball is probably most known for its infamous Halle Berry nude scene, even though there are a lot of other reasons to go and watch the film. It has some of the best acting in movie history; Halle Berry, Billy Bob Thornton, Heath Ledger, and even Sean "Puffy" Combs deliver some really convincing performances that result in an intense and exciting character-driven drama. That this didn't even get an Oscar nomination is outrageous.

Minority Report dir. Steven Spielberg (2002)

A modern masterpiece from Steven Spielberg, who for the past three decades has had the amazing ability to almost consistently make movies that both are great in quality and bring in the cash. I would have to pick Minority Report as Spielberg's greatest work of this decade. Spielberg uses some really effective editing, cinematography, special effects, and art design to make a dark, sci-fi thriller that is constantly exciting and a little eerie. Other great Spielberg movies of the 2000's include Munich and Catch Me If You Can.

City of God dir. Fernando Meirelles (2002)

If I had to rank these movies, the thrilling Brazilian film City of God would take either the #1 or #2 spot (competing with No Country for Old Men). If one word could best describe this movie, it would be "awesome." There are just so many elements that make this movie so great: a captivating plot, superb acting, lightning fast editing, and a great, visceral depiction of the violent Brazilian slums. Sadly, City of God isn't too well known outside of the film enthusiast circle ("wait, is that the movie with Nicolas Cage in it?"), but it is a modern classic and a great piece of foreign cinema.

American Splendor dir. Shari Springer Berman & Robert Pulcini (2003)

As far as biopics go, American Splendor probably tops the list in terms of creativity. The film looks at the life of comic book artist Harvey Pekar, whose comic series "American Splendor" is itself semi-autobiographical. Unique storytelling techniques make the film always entertaining, including the intertwining of portrayals of Pekar and his wife Joyce Brabner by actors with documentary footage of Pekar and Brabner themselves. When it comes to adapting a comic for the big screen, Pekar has to be happy with this result, as opposed to frame-for-frame recreations like those done in Sin City, 300, and Watchmen.

Sideways dir. Alexander Payne (2004)

I feel like Sideways is often underrated because it was advertised as a comedy about wine. It does have a few funny moments, and it does have wine, but I would definitely call it a drama - a fantastic one - that uses wine as a metaphoric device. The main strength of the film is definitely the acting. The four leads can really draw out all different kinds of emotion from a script that is efficient but very demanding from an acting perspective. Paul Giamatti's performance was particularly memorable, and it's a shame that the Academy thinks that more acting is better acting, when it penalizes those like Giamatti who are trying to be genuine.

Grizzly Man dir. Werner Herzog (2005)

Our representative of the documentary genre in this list is Werner Herzog's Grizzly Man - an intriguing though at times haunting look into the life and death of "Grizzly Man" Timothy Treadwell. The film is made largely from footage shot by Treadwell himself as he makes yearly ventures into the depths of Alaska, living among the bears and hoping to raise awareness about them. It is also a meditation on both Treadwell's complex drives and passions, as well as human nature itself, and throughout the film you can't help but deeply analyze Treadwell's nature - is he a hero or is he just nuts?

Children of Men dir. Alfonso Cuarón (2006)

Mexican director Alfonso Cuarón of Y Tu Mamá También and Harry Potter 3 fame follows up with the visionary Children of Men, which creates one of the most believable dystopias in fiction. Instead of having a world with flying cars, robot servants, and laser guns, the future world in Children of Men looks much like the world of today, but just a lot worse. The film creates a dark but fascinating atmosphere that combines with some smart action and themes that are all across the emotional spectrum, resulting in one of the greatest films of our generation.

Pan's Labyrinth dir. Guillermo del Toro (2006)

This past decade has been marked by the sudden growth of Mexican cinema, with directors like Alfonso Cuarón, Alejandro González Iñárritu, and Guillermo del Toro leading the way. Del Toro's Pan's Labyrinth stands out in particular and has been able to gather a mainstream acceptance in the U.S. because of its amazing, quasi-hypnotic depiction of a fantasy world. Well, really what makes this fantasy world so effective is its juxtaposition with the violent realities of the Spanish Civil War and its role in a well-crafted, painful and cruel story.

Zodiac dir. David Fincher (2007)

David Fincher, most famous as the director of Fight Club and Se7en, released this largely overlooked gem in 2007, which I consider to be the best of the three films. Unlike the other two films, Zodiac - which follows the true story of an everyman's obsession with tracking down and identifying the "Zodiac" serial killer - is told very plainly. Gone is the borderline-excessive grandeur of image (Se7en) and word (Fight Club), and instead we get a straight-up, captivating "thriller" of a mystery along with a fascinating character study.

Once dir. John Carney (2007)

Like its title, Once is simple. Watching this music-infused love story is like experiencing life itself. It's just a charming little story that doesn't hit you in the jaw when you watch it but sticks with you and grows on you. The two nameless lead characters are played by musicians, who not only play their roles more genuinely than any actor could, but also write all of the great music performed throughout the film. As for the plot, it's much like the classic Brief Encounter minus all the sappiness - and this lack of sappiness is exactly what makes Once feel so familiar.

Across the Universe dir. Julie Taymor (2007)

This musical, whose numbers are original renditions of Beatles' classics, was welcomed with mixed reviews. Overall, the music and visual style was received warmly, while the plot was more harshly criticized. While the plot is indeed far from the best, I'm pretty sure the main point of Across the Universe was to pack as many Beatles songs (33 to be exact) as they could into the movie and connect them with a loose plot to allow the narrative to flow linearly. The arrangements and visuals are so good that the weak plot is forgivable. I like to think of the film instead as 33 great, creative music videos.

No Country for Old Men dir. Joel & Ethan Coen (2007)

Along with City of God, this would be the other leading contender for what I consider the best film of the decade. The Coen brothers once again show off their versatility by creating this suspenseful take on Cormac McCarthy's novel that would make Alfred Hitchcock proud. In doing so they bring to life one of the craziest characters to ever hit the screen in the main villain Anton Chigurh, perfectly portrayed by Oscar winner Javier Bardem. In addition to a thoroughly exciting plot, which is essentially a big chase, the film features brilliant contrasts among the main players and evokes interesting thoughts about chance versus fate.

WALL-E dir. Andrew Stanton (2008)

Pixar has been releasing some great movies (and short films) year after year and definitely has been raising the bar when it comes to making high-quality animated films. In terms of overall quality, I'd have to put WALL-E at the top of the list, though Ratatouille, The Incredibles, Up, and Finding Nemo are all great, too. WALL-E is a visionary work that at times is reminiscent of ballet or Charlie Chaplin films, at others is an interesting look at a dystopian society, and at others is just tons of fun to watch. And perhaps the best part of WALL-E and Pixar's other works is that you can enjoy their movies no matter what you expect or look for.

Revolutionary Road dir. Sam Mendes (2008)

Sam Mendes won an Oscar in 1999 for American Beauty, which in many ways is similar to Revolutionary Road, though I would argue that the latter is the better film. Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet pair up once again and deliver performances of a lifetime to the tune of Richard Yates's classic novel. As we already saw in American Beauty, crazy things can happen in a family. In this case, the couple's desire to be special in the midst of a dull life results in some intense emotional agony, causing domestic chaos to ensue.

The Hurt Locker dir. Kathryn Bigelow (2009)

The Hurt Locker is a unique kind of war movie, which instead of building up to all-out battles focuses on the intensity and visceral nature of the individual on the battlefield. The film follows a group of three soldiers in Baghdad who defuse bombs. Of these three, the most interesting is their leader Sgt. James (Jeremy Renner), whose unique mentality, at times reckless behavior, and bomb-defusing expertise lead the team into some tight situations. The movie is worth watching if even just to appreciate its "realism," but also includes a fine portrayal of a complex character in Sgt. James.

*****

For those who want even more recommendations...

The Next 20
  • Amores Perros dir. Alejandro González Iñárritu (2000)
  • In the Bedroom dir. Todd Field (2001)
  • Hero dir. Zhang Yimou (2002)
  • Kill Bill: Vol. 1 dir. Quentin Tarantino (2003)
  • Mystic River dir. Clint Eastwood (2003)
  • In America dir. Jim Sheridan (2003)
  • Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind dir. Michel Gondry (2004)
  • The Incredibles dir. Brad Bird (2004)
  • Million Dollar Baby dir. Clint Eastwood (2004)
  • Tsotsi dir. Gavin Hood (2005)
  • Brokeback Mountain dir. Ang Lee (2005)
  • Munich dir. Steven Spielberg (2005)
  • Little Miss Sunshine dir. Jonathan Dayton & Valerie Faris (2006)
  • Letters from Iwo Jima dir. Clint Eastwood (2006)
  • Ratatouille dir. Brad Bird (2007)
  • Into the Wild dir. Sean Penn (2007)
  • Iron Man dir. Jon Favreau (2008)
  • Slumdog Millionaire dir. Danny Boyle (2008)
  • Gran Torino dir. Clint Eastwood (2008)
  • Fantastic Mr. Fox dir. Wes Anderson (2009)
Before you ask... no, I'm not particularly a fan of the LOTR trilogy, and yes, my favorite superhero movie is indeed Iron Man and not The Dark Knight.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Top 5 Movies of 2009 + Oscar Noms

The list of nominees for this year's Oscars was just released. The ceremonies themselves will be on March 7. Below are some of my thoughts and predictions, and at the very bottom of this post is my personal top 5 of 2009.

*****

Best Picture

Nominees: Avatar, The Blind Side, District 9, An Education, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious, A Serious Man, Up, Up in the Air

Comments: This year, the Academy decided to expand the field of nominees for Best Picture to 10 as opposed to the usual 5. This was probably due to the outrage that The Dark Knight didn't get a nomination last year. The result of this change is that more movies can now claim the title "Oscar nominee," but at the same time, that title is now less significant. If you want to figure out what the Academy deems the "Top 5," just take a look at the nominees for Best Director, which are in most cases consistent with the nominees for Best Picture.

No huge surprises here, maybe other than the omission of Clint Eastwood's Invictus in favor of The Blind Side. Nice to see District 9 and Up in this list. The more I look at this, though... 10 nominees is just ridiculous. The "niceness" of seeing some movies on the list of nominees doesn't make up for the damage they've done to the honor of getting such a nomination.

You'd have to consider The Hurt Locker a reasonably big favorite here. It has been, by far, the most critically acclaimed movie of the year, and this would be a perfect opportunity to finally honor a film made by a well-deserving woman. Avatar, which won the Golden Globe Award, remains a dark horse, and I'd all but eliminate any movie other than those two from contention.

*****

Best Directing

Nominees: James Cameron (Avatar), Kathryn Bigelow (The Hurt Locker), Quentin Tarantino (Inglourious Basterds), Lee Daniels (Precious), Jason Reitman (Up in the Air)

Comments: A worthy list that probably would have been exactly the same as the list of Best Picture nominees had the Academy not gotten their crazy idea. Kathryn Bigelow must win this. Yes, I am requiring that the Academy give this award to her. Bigelow's ex-husband James Cameron won the corresponding Golden Globe this year, which is unforgivable. I can see a case for Avatar winning Best Picture but absolutely not for Best Directing. If James Cameron wins this award, I might go crazy.

*****

Best Adapted Screenplay

Nominees: District 9, An Education, In the Loop, Precious, Up in the Air

Comments: Up in the Air and it's charming, nicely-paced writing is going to be hard to beat.

*****

Best Original Screenplay

Nominees: The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, The Messenger, A Serious Man, Up

Comments: This one is tougher to call. I like Tarantino's quirky yet deliberate writing in Inglourious Basterds here. Mark Boal's screenplay in The Hurt Locker also has to be in contention, largely because of the movie that it's in. The Coen brothers' A Serious Man has some... well, Coen-esque writing and could be a dark horse.

*****

Other Awards

Acting: I haven't seen many of these movies, but from what I've read, all four acting awards seem to be locks. Jeff Bridges, Sandra Bullock, Christoph Waltz, Mo'Nique - congratulations.

Animated Feature: Well, I've seen 4 of the 5 nominees. Bummed that Ponyo didn't make it. I'll be rooting for my favorite movie of the year Fantastic Mr. Fox, but realistically, Pixar should score their fifth win here with Up.

Cinematography: Avatar.

Editing: I'd have to go with The Hurt Locker for this one. Really impressive.

Visual Effects: Take a wild guess.

*****

My Top 5 of 2009

1) Fantastic Mr. Fox
2) The Hurt Locker
3) District 9
4) Up in the Air
5) Inglourious Basterds

Honorable mentions: Precious, Ponyo, (500) Days of Summer, Up, An Education

This list may change a little if I see any more movies from last year. Fantastic Mr. Fox and The Hurt Locker were easy choices for #1 and #2, though choosing what order to put them in was difficult. Let's just say that Fantastic Mr. Fox was "my favorite" movie of the year while The Hurt Locker was "the best." Really, really tough choice for the #5 spot between Inglourious Basterds and Precious. I guess this is what it feels like to be the Academy.

******

Coming soon: My top 10 movies of the decade!

Monday, January 25, 2010

More Mini-reviews

Here's another handful of mini-reviews of some of the movies to come out all throughout last year. I have a few more movies I'd like to see before I wrap up with a top five of 2009 list as well as a best of the decade list.

*****

The Hurt Locker
Dir. Kathryn Bigelow (2009)

*****

The Hurt Locker is one of the best war movies I've ever seen and is bound to be a top contender to win the Oscar. It's discouraging that no woman has ever won the Oscar for Best Director or has directed a Best Picture winner. I think this movie is definitely worthy of both prizes, so the Academy better not pass up this opportunity to make history and inspire other female moviemakers. The Hurt Locker is a different kind of war movie and will definitely be interesting for anyone who is interested in modern combat. As opposed to other war movies, which are saturated with disorienting gunfire and explosions, The Hurt Locker instead is a suspense-builder that is constructed with a great precision. The film follows a team of bomb defusers in Iraq. In particular, it focuses on William James (Jeremy Renner), who has such an obsession with defusing bombs that his squad views him as reckless. The combination of the tenseness of bomb defusing, the examination of a character's somewhat twisted psychology, and the details of modern warfare make The Hurt Locker a tough movie to not enjoy. While Fantastic Mr. Fox is as of now my "favorite" movie of the year, I would consider The Hurt Locker the "best" - and yes, there is a difference.

*****

My Rating: A

*****

A Serious Man
Dir. Joel & Ethan Coen (2009)

*****

Everyone seems to mention a "Coen brothers style," but in reality every single one of their movies is so different. After having made movies as strange as Raising Arizona, as uncomfortable as Fargo, and as thrilling as No Country For Old Men, it's hard to know what to expect next from these two geniuses. Their most recent work, A Serious Man, is very personal and also very odd. Right from the start you can tell what kind of movie this is going to be. The story is a modern day version of the book of Job, where everything goes badly for Larry Gopnik (Michael Stuhlbarg). Everything that happens to him is strangely funny after you let the movie settle in. While viewing A Serious Man, though, I had a hard time being able to see where the movie was going. This is a film that is meant to be watched more than once. While I found it enjoyable on my first viewing, I do expect it to be better the second time.

*****

My Rating: B+

*****

Ponyo
Dir. Hayao Miyazaki (2009)

*****

It seems like the animation industry is heading towards going entirely 3-D, so I'm very thankful that we still have Hayao Miyazaki, who is well-loved for his magical style of hand-drawn 2-D animation. His works are all connected by an element of magic, and we have an idea what to expect from him nowadays. Much of his work is deep and mature - like the recent Spirited Away and Howl's Moving Castle. I must say though that I am more a fan of Miyazaki's classic My Neighbor Totoro, which is a much simpler cartoon that is filled from top to bottom with charm. Ponyo has the same simplicity and charm, and so it is unsurprising that I enjoyed it a ton. The story is about a fish named Ponyo who runs away from her family, becomes friends with a human boy, and eventually wants to become a human herself. This is a story that is filled with so much expression (not just in the characters, but also the style of drawing in general), and using 3-D animation à la Pixar or Dreamworks would just not work here. It is probably a lot to hope for, but I hope that Ponyo and Disney's recent The Princess and the Frog will mark the beginning of a 2-D animation renaissance.

*****

My Rating: A

*****

Adventureland
Dir. Greg Mottola (2009)

*****

Greg Mottola, who made Superbad, returns two years later with Adventureland - another coming of age story that replaces the sheer hilarity of Superbad with an extra dose of charm. This movie was kind of marketed as being similar to Superbad, which was a goofy move in my opinion, as the shortage of funniness in Adventureland was definitely much more of a disappointment as it should have been. Putting that issue aside, we're left with a hip "love" story, though in this film the line between "love" and "getting some" is blurry. Perhaps it's exactly this that makes the movie, and especially the ending, a little awkward for me. Both of the lead actors (Jesse Eisenberg and Kristen Stewart) play their roles to perfection, but I don't think the way the characters were written was exactly impeccable. Which stinks because the movie revolves around the contrast between the two characters' lifestyles. Oh well.

*****

My Rating: B-

*****

Precious
Dir. Lee Daniels (2009)

*****

Precious is one of the most powerful movies I've seen in a while - it's mostly devastating but has glimpses of inspiration. The acting across the board is perfect, though the film is largely carried by Gabourey Sidibe as Precious and Mo'Nique as her abusive mother Mary. Life is about as bad for Precious as it can get. She's been the victim of incest and is now pregnant with her second child; she's an outcast at school and at home. However, throughout all of this, Precious displays all of the characteristics that suggest that she can take control of her own future. The film is about turning these hopeful characteristics into actions. Sidibe is perfect in displaying Precious's complex emotional states and really brings the audience into the film. Meanwhile, though Mo'Nique's character seems to be an "antagonist," her character is also the result of a complex set of emotions. Both actresses are bound to get Oscar nominations, and the film is highly worthy of one too.

*****

My Rating: A

*****

Drag Me To Hell
Dir. Sam Raimi (2009)

*****

If you're a fan of the Evil Dead trilogy and miss the old Sam Raimi style before he went mainstream to make the Spiderman trilogy, then Drag Me To Hell will be a nice little treat - though don't see the movie expecting something as crazy as Army of Darkness. Drag Me To Hell has many of those over-the-top moments that ride the border between scary and funny, just like in those Evil Dead movies. However, the main downfall here is that Raimi's attempts to bring the plot together are weak. There is a level of mysticism in Drag Me To Hell that explains why protagonist Christine Brown (Alison Lohman) is being chased by a crazy lady spirit in the first place. However, unlike in The Evil Dead, where the scenes that explain the mystical elements are themselves scary, in this film, those scenes are actually kind of boring and just seem like filler. A subplot involving Christine's career aspirations is kind of fluffy as well. Still, as long as you can get over Justin Long's acting (he should just stick to Mac commercials), Drag Me To Hell is overall a fun experience, and something I recommend for anyone who likes the Evil Dead movies or over-the-top horror in general.

*****

My Rating: B

*****

Coraline
Dir. Henry Selick (2009)

*****

Neil Gaiman's graphic novels are magical, and the expressionist style of 3-D animation that Henry Selick (maker of The Nightmare Before Christmas and James and the Giant Peach) brings to the table is a great fit for Gaiman's Coraline. Overall, I don't think Gaiman's works are meant to be turned into movies, but if a movie must be made, this is probably how it should be done. The film adaptation of Coraline isn't bad, but it doesn't do too much to impress - and I think this kind of thing happens a lot in general when adapting graphic novels into movies. I haven't read the book, but it's often the case (as in Watchmen and Sin City) that a film adaptation tries to be an exact copy of the book, especially since the images are already given. This is unlike adapting a prose novel, where the film director is given a lot more freedom to create his or her own visualizations of the book. Coraline is satisfying in its expressionist visuals and silly style of horror, but I feel that both aspects could have been a lot, lot better. Perhaps a little more of the horror aspect would have been nice.

*****

My Rating: B+

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Mini-reviews: Fantastic Mr. Fox, The Princess and the Frog, Up In the Air

It's Oscar season and there are a ton of great movies out now! I've got a lot to talk about but don't plan on writing too much, so here are some quick thoughts.

*****

Fantastic Mr. Fox
Dir. Wes Anderson (2009)

*****

Fantastic Mr. Fox was a riot. Hardcore fans of Wes Anderson or Roald Dahl may take issue with the movie, as it is not exactly made in the typical Anderson style, nor is it quite true to the original book. Fortunately for me, I am not too much of either. One thing that puzzles me is that Fantastic Mr. Fox for some reason seemed to be marketed as a kids' movie (it is not). But anyway, this is the best movie I've seen so far this year, for many reasons. The simplest is that it is straight out fun. The characters are awesome, and the fact that they are all animals makes it even more amusing. The unique style of humor that Wes Anderson adds to his movies fits this film perfectly. Fantastic Mr. Fox is done with stop-motion animation, but somehow the characters' expressions actually look genuine, which is even more impressive because they are animals! George Clooney delivers his lines as Mr. Fox with the slickness and slyness of a fox, and all of the other animals have their memorable moments - from the depression and jealousy of Mr. Fox's son Ash to the hilarious nervousness of the mole Kylie. This is a movie I can watch over and over and over again.

*****

My Rating: A

*****

The Princess and the Frog
It's a Disney movie (2009)

*****

For those of you who, like I, miss the classic-style 2-D Disney animation, this will be a bit of a treat. I never thought that 3-D animation was inherently any better or worse than the hand-drawn 2-D style, so it made me sad when the entire animation industry basically made only 3-D movies in recent years. Anyway, The Princess and the Frog brings a cute new twist to the well-known story, where instead of making the frog human, the kiss makes the human a frog. The voodoo themes of the cartoon seemed mature and I'm surprised that Disney created this movie in the first place, as I can see kids getting really scared from this stuff. I thought the villains were great - one has voodoo powers that result in some pretty crazy scenes throughout the movie; the other is driven more by greed and revenge than by pure evil, which is just about as human as we can expect from a Disney villain. A particular scene towards the end of the movie is one of the best I've ever seen in a cartoon. Unfortunately, The Princess and the Frog has two major downfalls. The first is a kind of identity crisis, where the movie was kind of in between a kids' movie and a grown-ups' movie. Disney usually does a good job making their movies appropriate for all ages, but in this movie, the scenes kind of alternated between ones for kids' and ones for grown-ups', which was kind of awkward. The other was the lack of any memorable songs whatsoever. The songs were made in a kind of New Orleans jazzy style that seemed appropriate considering the setting of the movie, but was probably ultimately a bad move.

*****

My Rating: B

*****

Up In the Air
Dir. Jason Reitman (2009)

*****

Yes, you have probably heard that this movie is about a guy who fires people for a living and flies a lot. So did I before watching this, but before going to see this, I couldn't imagine what the plot could possibly be like. Well, it turns out that just like in Jason Reitman's previous film Juno, the important thing is not necessarily the plot, but instead the premise of the film and the interactions between the characters. I won't get into too much description, since there's some pretty complex character development going on. Overall though, the movie has a great balance between some really interesting themes involving relationships and charming humor of the same type as in Juno. The director himself puts it perfectly. "In one sense, it’s a movie about a man who fires people for a living. In another sense, it’s a movie about a man who collects air miles excessively. In another sense, it’s about a man who meets a woman who’s so similar to him that even though they both believe in the idea of living solo, they begin to fall in love." In short, Up In the Air is a lot like Juno, but - in my opinion - better. Definitely a front-runner for Best Adapted Screenplay.

*****

My Rating: A-

*****

Movies I still would like to watch: The Hurt Locker, A Serious Man, Precious, An Education, (500) Days of Summer, Ponyo, Moon, Coraline